Why not prepare a Pre-Budget submission?
Posted on 26 Nov 2025
Charities and not-for-profits can be outstanding advocates for their cause, their community, their…
Posted on 20 Sep 2023
By David Crosbie
The federal government appears to be taking the risk of cyber-crime seriously – just not when it comes to the concerns or vulnerability of the charities and not-for-profit sector, writes Community Council for Australia CEO David Crosbie.
“The Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), which monitors and provides advice on cyber threats, received more than 76,000 reports during the 2021–22 financial year. On average, this equates to a cyberattack every seven minutes. Self-reported losses for one year totalled in excess of $35 billion.” (ACSC Annual Cyber Threat Report, July 2021 to June 2022)
The Australian government is finalising a new cyber security strategy.
The Minister for Home Affairs, Clare O’Neil, outlined the government's intention in a speech to the Australian Financial Review Cyber Summit this week.
Leading into her description of the new cyber security policy, Minister O’Neil said, “Cyber security is the fastest changing national security threat that our country faces... we have an urgent economic and security imperative to make a step change as a country for how we deal with cyber issues.”
The new Cyber Security Strategy will include six "shields" across the following areas:
Cyber security is now a priority concern for governments and business.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for all charities, even though the potential for damaging cyber security hacks in this sector is just as real and pressing.
In a joint Community Council for Australia (CCA) and Australian Council for International Development (ACFID) webinar this week, Lyn Morgain from Oxfam and Doug Taylor from the Smith Family outlined their experiences as CEOs of organisations that had experienced a cyber attack.
Their presentations were made more poignant by the fact that both these charities had invested considerable time and energy ensuring they had good cyber security and systems protections in place before they were attacked.
Between them Oxfam and the Smith Family had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars addressing the hacks, and both also had to deal with the reputational risk as they made full public disclosures.
The lesson we all learnt listening to Lyn and Doug describe their experiences was that no matter how well prepared you think you are, an attack is a case of when, not if.
Even a small hack could have devastating consequences for an organisation. In some cases, the data held within charities and NFPs is much more sensitive than in many businesses.
David Spriggs, the CEO of Infoxchange, pointed out that according to his organisation's surveys of the sector, Oxfam and the Smith Family were in the top 20% of well-prepared charities and NFPs when it comes to cyber security.
Almost 50% of charities and NFPs do not have multi-factor authentication as standard in protecting access to their systems and devices. The same number do not train their staff in cyber security awareness.
Many charities and NFPs suggest cost is the issue preventing them from putting in place cyber security protection, while others indicate it is simply not their highest priority.
Either way, it seems the sector is a sitting duck for bad actors seeking to disrupt and capitalise on weak cyber security.
"Charities and NFPs need to do a lot more to address the threat posed by cyber security, especially given that we are clearly not a priority for government."
At CCA we wrote to the Prime Minister, the Minister for Home Affairs, and the National Cyber Security Co-ordinator a month ago. Copies of the letter were provided to the Assistant Minister for Charities, Dr Andrew Leigh.
Our letter argued in part:
“Charities hold extensive personal and financial information from millions of Australians.
“Despite having a massive footprint in our economy and in our lives, charities and not-for-profits have not been provided with the support they need to deal with an increasingly sophisticated level of cyber-attacks.
“Unlike business, charities spend every spare dollar they can find on serving their communities. Allocating more resources to strengthen cyber security would mean reducing the level of services available in our communities.
“Many charities and NFPs struggle to withdraw services, even though cyber security is clearly an important priority.
“There will be cyber-attacks on charities and there is real potential for certain kinds of attacks to significantly damage confidence and trust in our sector. Cyber-attacks in our sector could also have devastating impacts on individuals and communities.

“We ask that you consider providing increased support for charities across Australia to be able to review their current cyber security preparedness and to invest in better data security and protection.
“This is no more than what your government is already providing to business.
"Leaving charities to fend for themselves in dealing with the threat posed by global cyber security attacks is not an acceptable policy approach.”
Not once did the Minister for Home Affairs mention charities or not-for profits in her speech to the Cyber Summit, nor in the subsequent media coverage and discussion of cyber threats that I managed to follow.
No one has responded to our letters.
It’s as though cyber security is only an issue for business or government. Or that charities and NFPs are seen as a subset of small business – even though none of the extensive small business cybersecurity concessions and grants are available to our sector.
Charities and NFPs need to do a lot more to address the threat posed by cybersecurity, especially given that we are clearly not a priority for government.
It will be the communities we serve who will ultimately pay the price if we fail to support the cyber security capacity of charities and NFPs in Australia.
David Crosbie has been CEO of the Community Council for Australia for the past decade and has spent more than a quarter of a century leading significant not-for-profit organisations, including the Mental Health Council of Australia, the Alcohol and other Drugs Council of Australia, and Odyssey House Victoria.
Posted on 26 Nov 2025
Charities and not-for-profits can be outstanding advocates for their cause, their community, their…
Posted on 12 Nov 2025
Managing a charity or not-for-profit in Australia is often more complex than it may appear. On any…
Posted on 29 Oct 2025
One of the most contentious debates across many areas of human services is the for-profit versus…
Posted on 28 Oct 2025
Workers in the not-for-profit sector lift up communities, care for those in crisis and do work that…
Posted on 08 Oct 2025
The cost of climate change's impact on Australian life is increasingly well documented. The…
Posted on 08 Oct 2025
The Wurundjeri Indigenous people who live in and around Melbourne understand their environment as…
Posted on 30 Sep 2025
I am proud of what Our Community, and its exceptional team, have achieved in the past 25 years. As…
Posted on 24 Sep 2025
If a business ran the government, a corporatocracy would likely emerge, prioritising profit over…
Posted on 09 Sep 2025
This has been another big week in the evolving story of tech oligarchs versus Australia, profit…
Posted on 03 Sep 2025
The problem with the NDIS is not autistic families or children, says Annabel Rattigan, a leadership…
Posted on 27 Aug 2025
It used to be that businesses could concentrate on profits, profits and profits, only playing in…
Posted on 26 Aug 2025
There is no Department of Charities in the federal government, no red book, no blue book for an…