Why life for our kids is safer than it was for our parents
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
Rose coloured glasses give false comfort to those who look longingly at the past, says group…
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
By Adele Stowe-Lindner, general manager, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Time and time again, we read news accounts of boards that did not have their eyes on the ball and were eventually held to account.
However, what of situations in which the board is too deeply involved and could be accused of interference? Walking the line between oversight and interference is difficult, and the board will be blamed either way if it gets it wrong.
It's all too easy for board members to interfere without intending to do so. For volunteers and staff members, approaching a board member to vent frustrations or chat about challenges is as easy as standing next to them in the coffee queue at the local footy match or running into them at the hardware store or bakery.
One of the key questions board members can ask themselves to remind them to “swim in their lane” is this: What expectation are we instilling in the volunteer or staff member regarding the likelihood that we will act upon their information?
An incidental encounter like this can be useful in provoking us to consider why the volunteer or staff member is mentioning their grievance to us in this way.
Does the organisation have an adequate complaints policy?
Does the policy make clear how volunteers and staff can give feedback to the organisation or board?
Does the organisation have a strong communications practice, such that if managers hear about problems they communicate them upwards, and they come to the board?
Does the organisation have a psychologically safe culture, such that volunteers and staff feel comfortable sharing their concerns with managers, rather than going to the board?
The board is responsible for ensuring that the organisation is sustainable into the future, which requires concern for the health of the whole organisation, not the navigation of each individual qualm.
When a board member passes information to the organisational leadership, they can do so from a position of trust ("I told the complainant they should share this with their manager") or from a position of undermining ("I told the complainant I would fix this problem for them").
Strategic oversight requires strong trust that the culture and direction set by the board will be navigated and implemented appropriately on the operational level.
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
Rose coloured glasses give false comfort to those who look longingly at the past, says group…
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
Time and time again, we read news accounts of boards that did not have their eyes on the ball and…
Posted on 14 Mar 2024
I’m regularly shocked at how few organisations thank their greatest supporters. Call me old…
Posted on 14 Mar 2024
A core responsibility of the professional and board leadership of any not-for-profit is…
Posted on 07 Feb 2024
The past eight years or so – roughly since Trump’s first presidential campaign – have seen opinions…
Posted on 21 Nov 2023
Staff leaders and board leaders have many important responsibilities, but perhaps none is as…
Posted on 12 Oct 2023
GiveNow executive director Cathy Truong Before Cathy Truong joined Our Community as GiveNow’s…
Posted on 11 Oct 2023
When I sat recently on a panel established to appoint a new CEO to a national not-for-profit…
Posted on 11 Oct 2023
First comes the hero. An out-of-the-ordinary citizen sees a glaring abuse in our society, hits the…
Posted on 13 Sep 2023
Stepping up into a role as chair of the board is a big deal.
Posted on 16 Aug 2023
Climate change is our very own modern-day monster, but if we act together, it is possible we will…
Posted on 12 Apr 2023
In kids’ sport, we often tell our smaller competitors that a short-term loss can be a long-term win…