AI on a shoestring budget: what we learned by actually doing it
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
There’s a line of thought about AI in the not-for-profit sector that goes something like this: “We…
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
By Adele Stowe-Lindner, general manager, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Time and time again, we read news accounts of boards that did not have their eyes on the ball and were eventually held to account.
However, what of situations in which the board is too deeply involved and could be accused of interference? Walking the line between oversight and interference is difficult, and the board will be blamed either way if it gets it wrong.

It's all too easy for board members to interfere without intending to do so. For volunteers and staff members, approaching a board member to vent frustrations or chat about challenges is as easy as standing next to them in the coffee queue at the local footy match or running into them at the hardware store or bakery.
One of the key questions board members can ask themselves to remind them to “swim in their lane” is this: What expectation are we instilling in the volunteer or staff member regarding the likelihood that we will act upon their information?
An incidental encounter like this can be useful in provoking us to consider why the volunteer or staff member is mentioning their grievance to us in this way.
Does the organisation have an adequate complaints policy?
Does the policy make clear how volunteers and staff can give feedback to the organisation or board?
Does the organisation have a strong communications practice, such that if managers hear about problems they communicate them upwards, and they come to the board?
Does the organisation have a psychologically safe culture, such that volunteers and staff feel comfortable sharing their concerns with managers, rather than going to the board?
The board is responsible for ensuring that the organisation is sustainable into the future, which requires concern for the health of the whole organisation, not the navigation of each individual qualm.
When a board member passes information to the organisational leadership, they can do so from a position of trust ("I told the complainant they should share this with their manager") or from a position of undermining ("I told the complainant I would fix this problem for them").
Strategic oversight requires strong trust that the culture and direction set by the board will be navigated and implemented appropriately on the operational level.
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
There’s a line of thought about AI in the not-for-profit sector that goes something like this: “We…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
ICDA training lead Nina Laitala examines the governance issues facing Australian not-for-profits.
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
An AI assistant designed with input from the frontline care workers who use it is saving staff…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
The not-for-profit sector's greatest asset in the age of artificial intelligence is its ability to…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
Australia’s leading drug and alcohol information provider has used AI to transform the way it…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
A survey of directors across hundreds of boards in Australia and New Zealand and beyond has found…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
Sabine Bird has shaped her career around a small outback town most Australians couldn't find on a…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
A detailed guide to help not-for-profits roll out artificial intelligence pilots is flying off the…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
A leading gender equity lobby comprising hundreds of Australia’s top CEOs and board members has…
Posted on 09 Jun 2026
Keynote delivered by ACOSS president and CEO of Sacred Heart Mission Hang Vo at the 2026…
Posted on 03 Jun 2026
Most Australians take having internet access at home for granted, but that’s not true for many…
Posted on 03 Jun 2026
A new accounting standard that promises to simplify financial reporting for smaller not-for-profits…