Getting the right people will be the best investment your organisation ever makes
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Lately I’ve been spending a lot of time in interview rooms.
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
By Adele Stowe-Lindner, general manager, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Time and time again, we read news accounts of boards that did not have their eyes on the ball and were eventually held to account.
However, what of situations in which the board is too deeply involved and could be accused of interference? Walking the line between oversight and interference is difficult, and the board will be blamed either way if it gets it wrong.

It's all too easy for board members to interfere without intending to do so. For volunteers and staff members, approaching a board member to vent frustrations or chat about challenges is as easy as standing next to them in the coffee queue at the local footy match or running into them at the hardware store or bakery.
One of the key questions board members can ask themselves to remind them to “swim in their lane” is this: What expectation are we instilling in the volunteer or staff member regarding the likelihood that we will act upon their information?
An incidental encounter like this can be useful in provoking us to consider why the volunteer or staff member is mentioning their grievance to us in this way.
Does the organisation have an adequate complaints policy?
Does the policy make clear how volunteers and staff can give feedback to the organisation or board?
Does the organisation have a strong communications practice, such that if managers hear about problems they communicate them upwards, and they come to the board?
Does the organisation have a psychologically safe culture, such that volunteers and staff feel comfortable sharing their concerns with managers, rather than going to the board?
The board is responsible for ensuring that the organisation is sustainable into the future, which requires concern for the health of the whole organisation, not the navigation of each individual qualm.
When a board member passes information to the organisational leadership, they can do so from a position of trust ("I told the complainant they should share this with their manager") or from a position of undermining ("I told the complainant I would fix this problem for them").
Strategic oversight requires strong trust that the culture and direction set by the board will be navigated and implemented appropriately on the operational level.
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Lately I’ve been spending a lot of time in interview rooms.
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Tania Sacco knows what it means to aim carefully. As a competitive archer who has represented…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Australian boards are being urged to strengthen their oversight of technology and artificial…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Earlier this year, a nine-member board I worked with lost four of its directors on the same day. It…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Many new directors walk into their first board meeting unprepared – not because they lack…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
The average Australian not-for-profit sector employee is less satisfied about the rewards and…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Not-for-profits that seek to solve performance problems by hiring new staff might be missing the…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
The Australian Red Cross has overhauled its governance, replacing a large member-based board with a…
Posted on 13 Apr 2026
A Community Directors survey of not-for-profit leaders’ biggest governance concerns has prompted a…
Posted on 12 Mar 2026
Australia’s not-for-profits win nearly half the grants they apply for, but time and resourcing…
Posted on 12 Mar 2026
If government were to give you a blank cheque for one million dollars tomorrow, what would you do…
Posted on 12 Mar 2026
Sector advocates are ramping up a campaign to give tens of thousands more charities favoured tax…