
Community organisations are the beating heart of our democracy
Posted on 10 Apr 2025
As adults, we vote for representatives at election time and appoint people to positions. We’ll be…
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
By Adele Stowe-Lindner, general manager, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Time and time again, we read news accounts of boards that did not have their eyes on the ball and were eventually held to account.
However, what of situations in which the board is too deeply involved and could be accused of interference? Walking the line between oversight and interference is difficult, and the board will be blamed either way if it gets it wrong.
It's all too easy for board members to interfere without intending to do so. For volunteers and staff members, approaching a board member to vent frustrations or chat about challenges is as easy as standing next to them in the coffee queue at the local footy match or running into them at the hardware store or bakery.
One of the key questions board members can ask themselves to remind them to “swim in their lane” is this: What expectation are we instilling in the volunteer or staff member regarding the likelihood that we will act upon their information?
An incidental encounter like this can be useful in provoking us to consider why the volunteer or staff member is mentioning their grievance to us in this way.
Does the organisation have an adequate complaints policy?
Does the policy make clear how volunteers and staff can give feedback to the organisation or board?
Does the organisation have a strong communications practice, such that if managers hear about problems they communicate them upwards, and they come to the board?
Does the organisation have a psychologically safe culture, such that volunteers and staff feel comfortable sharing their concerns with managers, rather than going to the board?
The board is responsible for ensuring that the organisation is sustainable into the future, which requires concern for the health of the whole organisation, not the navigation of each individual qualm.
When a board member passes information to the organisational leadership, they can do so from a position of trust ("I told the complainant they should share this with their manager") or from a position of undermining ("I told the complainant I would fix this problem for them").
Strategic oversight requires strong trust that the culture and direction set by the board will be navigated and implemented appropriately on the operational level.
Posted on 10 Apr 2025
As adults, we vote for representatives at election time and appoint people to positions. We’ll be…
Posted on 13 Mar 2025
As adults, we vote for representatives at election time and appoint people to positions. We’ll be…
Posted on 18 Feb 2025
Not-for-profits have a responsibility and the capacity to strengthen civil society writes Adele…
Posted on 12 Dec 2024
Managing change well is an essential part of good leadership says Adele Stowe-Lindner, executive…
Posted on 13 Nov 2024
Offering a four-day work week could be one way to restrike the work-life balance, writes group…
Posted on 13 Nov 2024
Human resources management is difficult. HR often leaves board members flummoxed, as people…
Posted on 10 Oct 2024
Activism has always played a part in shaping government policies, communities and businesses. It…
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
NFPs would be wise to consider innovative ways to diversify their income and the benefits of doing…
Posted on 17 Jul 2024
The importance of strong communities has never been more apparent.
Posted on 12 Jun 2024
AGMs are sometimes seen as irritating annual bureaucratic hurdles, as meetings that must be held…
Posted on 08 May 2024
Not-for-profits are often humble about their impact, and shy to share their suggested policy fixes…
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
Rose coloured glasses give false comfort to those who look longingly at the past, says group…