What’s keeping not-for-profit leaders awake at night?
Posted on 13 Apr 2026
A Community Directors survey of not-for-profit leaders’ biggest governance concerns has prompted a…
Posted on 11 Feb 2025
By Greg Thom, journalist, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Charity and not-for-profit organisations have banded together to voice their concerns that the federal government’s proposed electoral reforms could curtail the sector’s ability to advocate.
The controversial Electoral Reform Bill, which is likely to be introduced to Parliament this week, is designed to introduce caps on political donations and spending.
However, the Stronger Charities Alliance has called for changes to ensure that if the Bill is passed, charities will continue to have a voice in election debates.
More than 30 sector organisations have penned an open letter to Special Minister of State Don Farrell warning of potential unintended consequences of the legislation, saying the reforms could disproportionately affect charities over and above political parties.
The bill, which was originally scheduled to be introduced to Parliament late last year and passed into law just two weeks later, attracted a flurry of criticism that the government had not allowed enough time for the proposed changes to be properly scrutinised.
The government’s timetable was derailed when negotiations with the Coalition collapsed, causing the bill’s introduction to be delayed until the current parliamentary session.
Changes proposed in the bill include:
The reforms would not come into effect until after this year’s federal election.
Under the proposed reforms, charities would be unable to use most of the donations they received on electoral spending.
While this would potentially limit their ability to contribute to election debates, it would not restrict the activities of political parties or candidates.
While supportive of improved transparency in elections, civil society groups have worked hard behind the scenes to try and mitigate any negative impact from the electoral reforms on charities ability to advocate.
A key plank of the electoral reforms relates to the treatment of third parties – groups that campaign during elections but don’t field candidates, such as trade unions, business lobby groups, charities and NFPs.
The SCA has long argued that charities differed from other third parties because they are legally prohibited from supporting or opposing candidates in elections and instead must engage in issues-based advocacy, which is closely monitored by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC).
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
Australian Democracy Network executive director Saffron Zomer said charities were different from political parties.
“We don’t make laws, we can’t form government, and we’re legally bound to pursue the public interest. New election rules need to recognise this.”

Zomer said that if the Albanese government adopted a “one-size-fits-all” approach to electoral reform then the outcome would be that voters would hear more from political parties and powerful interests and less from the charity voices they trust.
“We appreciate that the minister has been open to feedback from the sector,” she said.
“Now it’s time for the government and all members of parliament to commit to protecting the participation of charities in public debates around election time.”
Zomer’s comments were echoed by other senior sector leaders, including Australian Conservation Foundation CEO Kelly O’Shanassy, who said advocating for policy change that makes Australia better is core business for charities.
“We do this day in and day out and it is ever more valid in the lead up to elections when parties and candidates get serious about developing their policies,” she said.
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
St Vincent de Paul Society National Council CEO Toby O’Connor said the words of the Society's founder, Frédéric Ozanam, still resonated today: “There is no charity without justice.”
“As well as providing assistance at times of need, the Society continues to advocate for social change based on the principles of justice and compassion, and we strongly support the work of the Stronger Charities Alliance in furthering these goals.”
Mixed bag for sector in Canberra's end-of-year legislative scramble
Posted on 13 Apr 2026
A Community Directors survey of not-for-profit leaders’ biggest governance concerns has prompted a…
Posted on 08 Apr 2026
It doesn't seem unreasonable to ask our political parties to actually outline their policies, what…
Posted on 08 Apr 2026
In the 100th issue of the Quarterly Essay, Sean Kelly asked questions of Labor, and specifically…
Posted on 08 Apr 2026
Anti-gambling advocate Tim Costello has lashed the federal government’s new restrictions on…
Posted on 08 Apr 2026
A current major global survey of charities is a vital conduit between Australian not-for-profits…
Posted on 08 Apr 2026
The She Gives philanthropic campaign aims to encourage women to give, to give more, and to give for…
Posted on 07 Apr 2026
The latest Community Directors news webinar aims to get not-for-profit and charity leaders up to…
Posted on 31 Mar 2026
This week during an interview I was asked why values and purpose are so important in our sector. My…
Posted on 31 Mar 2026
Government and charity leaders across Australia have welcomed the Australian Taxation Office’s…
Posted on 31 Mar 2026
A new project intends to explore the reasons behind the rise in white nationalism, racism and…
Posted on 31 Mar 2026
Calls for the federal government to commit to a 25 per cent gas export levy are rising across the…
Posted on 31 Mar 2026
Nathaniel Diong, the founder of Future Minds Network, was named in Forbes magazine’s 30 under 30…