Why winning philanthropic support is complicated
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
Experts in Australian philanthropy say there are stark differences between philanthropic money and…
Posted on 11 Feb 2025
By Greg Thom, journalist, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Charity and not-for-profit organisations have banded together to voice their concerns that the federal government’s proposed electoral reforms could curtail the sector’s ability to advocate.
The controversial Electoral Reform Bill, which is likely to be introduced to Parliament this week, is designed to introduce caps on political donations and spending.
However, the Stronger Charities Alliance has called for changes to ensure that if the Bill is passed, charities will continue to have a voice in election debates.
More than 30 sector organisations have penned an open letter to Special Minister of State Don Farrell warning of potential unintended consequences of the legislation, saying the reforms could disproportionately affect charities over and above political parties.
The bill, which was originally scheduled to be introduced to Parliament late last year and passed into law just two weeks later, attracted a flurry of criticism that the government had not allowed enough time for the proposed changes to be properly scrutinised.
The government’s timetable was derailed when negotiations with the Coalition collapsed, causing the bill’s introduction to be delayed until the current parliamentary session.
Changes proposed in the bill include:
The reforms would not come into effect until after this year’s federal election.
Under the proposed reforms, charities would be unable to use most of the donations they received on electoral spending.
While this would potentially limit their ability to contribute to election debates, it would not restrict the activities of political parties or candidates.
While supportive of improved transparency in elections, civil society groups have worked hard behind the scenes to try and mitigate any negative impact from the electoral reforms on charities ability to advocate.
A key plank of the electoral reforms relates to the treatment of third parties – groups that campaign during elections but don’t field candidates, such as trade unions, business lobby groups, charities and NFPs.
The SCA has long argued that charities differed from other third parties because they are legally prohibited from supporting or opposing candidates in elections and instead must engage in issues-based advocacy, which is closely monitored by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC).
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
Australian Democracy Network executive director Saffron Zomer said charities were different from political parties.
“We don’t make laws, we can’t form government, and we’re legally bound to pursue the public interest. New election rules need to recognise this.”

Zomer said that if the Albanese government adopted a “one-size-fits-all” approach to electoral reform then the outcome would be that voters would hear more from political parties and powerful interests and less from the charity voices they trust.
“We appreciate that the minister has been open to feedback from the sector,” she said.
“Now it’s time for the government and all members of parliament to commit to protecting the participation of charities in public debates around election time.”
Zomer’s comments were echoed by other senior sector leaders, including Australian Conservation Foundation CEO Kelly O’Shanassy, who said advocating for policy change that makes Australia better is core business for charities.
“We do this day in and day out and it is ever more valid in the lead up to elections when parties and candidates get serious about developing their policies,” she said.
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
St Vincent de Paul Society National Council CEO Toby O’Connor said the words of the Society's founder, Frédéric Ozanam, still resonated today: “There is no charity without justice.”
“As well as providing assistance at times of need, the Society continues to advocate for social change based on the principles of justice and compassion, and we strongly support the work of the Stronger Charities Alliance in furthering these goals.”
Mixed bag for sector in Canberra's end-of-year legislative scramble
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
Experts in Australian philanthropy say there are stark differences between philanthropic money and…
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
Australia’s biggest gathering of philanthropists, which drew more than 1200 delegates to Brisbane…
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
One of Australia’s foremost fundraising observers says Australian not-for-profits must get the…
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
My father often googles my name, and as a result, years ago, I received a surprising gift in the…
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
Charities reported $14.8 billion in donations and bequests last financial year, the second-highest…
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
As direct giving dries up, charities face growing dependence on big donors and negotiating the…
Posted on 17 Sep 2026
Where Evelyn Mugisha grew up in rural Uganda, the subjects and careers considered suitable for…
Posted on 16 Sep 2026
I met a man named John this week. I was at his house to pick up a guitar he was repairing.
Posted on 16 Sep 2026
In the face of challenging conditions in the giving sector, UNICEF Australia chief executive Tony…
Posted on 16 Sep 2026
Tourism is a large source of income for Kangaroo Island, 210 km south-west of Adelaide, but the…
Posted on 16 Sep 2026
While there is no shortage of studies examining not-for-profits from every angle, a new research…
Posted on 16 Sep 2026
A new partnership between Paul Ramsay Foundation (PRF) and Atlassian Foundation aims to attract…