Rebuilding trust, reducing grievance: the NFP sector must be part of the solution
Posted on 24 Jun 2026
It seems like an oxymoron to talk to about building trust in a global environment where it’s…
Posted on 11 Feb 2025
By Greg Thom, journalist, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Charity and not-for-profit organisations have banded together to voice their concerns that the federal government’s proposed electoral reforms could curtail the sector’s ability to advocate.
The controversial Electoral Reform Bill, which is likely to be introduced to Parliament this week, is designed to introduce caps on political donations and spending.
However, the Stronger Charities Alliance has called for changes to ensure that if the Bill is passed, charities will continue to have a voice in election debates.
More than 30 sector organisations have penned an open letter to Special Minister of State Don Farrell warning of potential unintended consequences of the legislation, saying the reforms could disproportionately affect charities over and above political parties.
The bill, which was originally scheduled to be introduced to Parliament late last year and passed into law just two weeks later, attracted a flurry of criticism that the government had not allowed enough time for the proposed changes to be properly scrutinised.
The government’s timetable was derailed when negotiations with the Coalition collapsed, causing the bill’s introduction to be delayed until the current parliamentary session.
Changes proposed in the bill include:
The reforms would not come into effect until after this year’s federal election.
Under the proposed reforms, charities would be unable to use most of the donations they received on electoral spending.
While this would potentially limit their ability to contribute to election debates, it would not restrict the activities of political parties or candidates.
While supportive of improved transparency in elections, civil society groups have worked hard behind the scenes to try and mitigate any negative impact from the electoral reforms on charities ability to advocate.
A key plank of the electoral reforms relates to the treatment of third parties – groups that campaign during elections but don’t field candidates, such as trade unions, business lobby groups, charities and NFPs.
The SCA has long argued that charities differed from other third parties because they are legally prohibited from supporting or opposing candidates in elections and instead must engage in issues-based advocacy, which is closely monitored by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC).
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
Australian Democracy Network executive director Saffron Zomer said charities were different from political parties.
“We don’t make laws, we can’t form government, and we’re legally bound to pursue the public interest. New election rules need to recognise this.”

Zomer said that if the Albanese government adopted a “one-size-fits-all” approach to electoral reform then the outcome would be that voters would hear more from political parties and powerful interests and less from the charity voices they trust.
“We appreciate that the minister has been open to feedback from the sector,” she said.
“Now it’s time for the government and all members of parliament to commit to protecting the participation of charities in public debates around election time.”
Zomer’s comments were echoed by other senior sector leaders, including Australian Conservation Foundation CEO Kelly O’Shanassy, who said advocating for policy change that makes Australia better is core business for charities.
“We do this day in and day out and it is ever more valid in the lead up to elections when parties and candidates get serious about developing their policies,” she said.
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
St Vincent de Paul Society National Council CEO Toby O’Connor said the words of the Society's founder, Frédéric Ozanam, still resonated today: “There is no charity without justice.”
“As well as providing assistance at times of need, the Society continues to advocate for social change based on the principles of justice and compassion, and we strongly support the work of the Stronger Charities Alliance in furthering these goals.”
Mixed bag for sector in Canberra's end-of-year legislative scramble
Posted on 24 Jun 2026
It seems like an oxymoron to talk to about building trust in a global environment where it’s…
Posted on 24 Jun 2026
Lizzie Mettam manages corporate partnerships for DV Safe Phone, an organisation that provides…
Posted on 24 Jun 2026
The charity sector is the quiet beneficiary of a share in nearly $90 million to build cyber…
Posted on 24 Jun 2026
Victoria’s Minister for Women and Girls, Gabrielle Williams, reflected that it was “a strange time…
Posted on 24 Jun 2026
A long-awaited accounting standard aimed at simplifying financial work for smaller not-for-profits…
Posted on 24 Jun 2026
A leading charity law scholar says there is "only now" for charities to push for legislative…
Posted on 17 Jun 2026
If charges are proven that members of the Brethren movement took part in partisan political…
Posted on 17 Jun 2026
NFPs and for purpose organisations need to be aware of the need to verify their “sender ID” from…
Posted on 17 Jun 2026
The merger of two leading youth mental health organisations offers a partnership model that could…
Posted on 17 Jun 2026
The pay cheques of charity CEOs rose significantly in the past year, according to the 2026 Pro Bono…
Posted on 17 Jun 2026
Francis Owusu is the founder of Kulture Break, a charity that helps young people build confidence,…
Posted on 10 Jun 2026
There’s a line of thought about AI in the not-for-profit sector that goes something like this: “We…