
Grief service in funding battle for survival
Posted on 19 Mar 2025
A national grief counselling service has won a short-term reprieve after a furious backlash against…
Posted on 11 Feb 2025
By Greg Thom, journalist, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Charity and not-for-profit organisations have banded together to voice their concerns that the federal government’s proposed electoral reforms could curtail the sector’s ability to advocate.
The controversial Electoral Reform Bill, which is likely to be introduced to Parliament this week, is designed to introduce caps on political donations and spending.
However, the Stronger Charities Alliance has called for changes to ensure that if the Bill is passed, charities will continue to have a voice in election debates.
More than 30 sector organisations have penned an open letter to Special Minister of State Don Farrell warning of potential unintended consequences of the legislation, saying the reforms could disproportionately affect charities over and above political parties.
The bill, which was originally scheduled to be introduced to Parliament late last year and passed into law just two weeks later, attracted a flurry of criticism that the government had not allowed enough time for the proposed changes to be properly scrutinised.
The government’s timetable was derailed when negotiations with the Coalition collapsed, causing the bill’s introduction to be delayed until the current parliamentary session.
Changes proposed in the bill include:
The reforms would not come into effect until after this year’s federal election.
Under the proposed reforms, charities would be unable to use most of the donations they received on electoral spending.
While this would potentially limit their ability to contribute to election debates, it would not restrict the activities of political parties or candidates.
While supportive of improved transparency in elections, civil society groups have worked hard behind the scenes to try and mitigate any negative impact from the electoral reforms on charities ability to advocate.
A key plank of the electoral reforms relates to the treatment of third parties – groups that campaign during elections but don’t field candidates, such as trade unions, business lobby groups, charities and NFPs.
The SCA has long argued that charities differed from other third parties because they are legally prohibited from supporting or opposing candidates in elections and instead must engage in issues-based advocacy, which is closely monitored by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC).
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
Australian Democracy Network executive director Saffron Zomer said charities were different from political parties.
“We don’t make laws, we can’t form government, and we’re legally bound to pursue the public interest. New election rules need to recognise this.”
Zomer said that if the Albanese government adopted a “one-size-fits-all” approach to electoral reform then the outcome would be that voters would hear more from political parties and powerful interests and less from the charity voices they trust.
“We appreciate that the minister has been open to feedback from the sector,” she said.
“Now it’s time for the government and all members of parliament to commit to protecting the participation of charities in public debates around election time.”
Zomer’s comments were echoed by other senior sector leaders, including Australian Conservation Foundation CEO Kelly O’Shanassy, who said advocating for policy change that makes Australia better is core business for charities.
“We do this day in and day out and it is ever more valid in the lead up to elections when parties and candidates get serious about developing their policies,” she said.
“Fairness and transparency in election funding is crucial to ensure elections are a contest of ideas, not money. It’s critical that these reforms don’t conflate non-partisan charities with partisan politics.”
St Vincent de Paul Society National Council CEO Toby O’Connor said the words of the Society's founder, Frédéric Ozanam, still resonated today: “There is no charity without justice.”
“As well as providing assistance at times of need, the Society continues to advocate for social change based on the principles of justice and compassion, and we strongly support the work of the Stronger Charities Alliance in furthering these goals.”
Mixed bag for sector in Canberra's end-of-year legislative scramble
Posted on 19 Mar 2025
A national grief counselling service has won a short-term reprieve after a furious backlash against…
Posted on 19 Mar 2025
When it comes to youth crime panic, we've heard it all before says Community Council for Australia…
Posted on 19 Mar 2025
A landmark report has revealed the widening gap between the cost of delivering desperately needed…
Posted on 18 Mar 2025
At last year’s conference marking the 50th anniversary of Elsie, Australia’s first feminist refuge,…
Posted on 18 Mar 2025
The Albanese government kept the nation guessing for weeks before finally confirming the federal…
Posted on 18 Mar 2025
As he approaches the end of his first year in the job, Andrew Binns is loving his time as the chief…
Posted on 13 Mar 2025
Two years after he completed ICDA’s Diploma of Governance, Raff Ciccone was elected a senator for…
Posted on 13 Mar 2025
Our party-political system isn't perfect, but it could be a whole lot worse, writes group managing…
Posted on 13 Mar 2025
As adults, we vote for representatives at election time and appoint people to positions. We’ll be…
Posted on 13 Mar 2025
Social enterprise advocates have welcomed a $1.2 million federal government cash injection for the…
Posted on 13 Mar 2025
A robust and broad-based children’s online privacy code is essential to protect young Australians…
Posted on 13 Mar 2025
ICDA training lead Nina Laitala examines the governance issues facing Australian not-for-profits.