Segmentation key to donations boost: experts
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
Fundraising experts say that better understanding donors’ attitudes to the community sector will go…
Posted on 10 Apr 2024
By Matthew Schulz, journalist, Institute of Community Directors Australia
Humans by their nature are an optimistic lot, and leaders in the community sector possibly more so.
With the tendency to assume that things will turn out okay, “optimism bias” can get in the way of best-practice risk management.
People in organisations – at all levels – believe they won’t be involved in an accident, that their projects will run to time, and that they’ll keep a lid on costs.
This trait is so well established that in the construction industry, project managers account for the bias by adding as much as 50% to initial estimates of building costs, especially for out-of-the-ordinary designs. The related “planning fallacy” lures us into thinking that the project will be completed in a much shorter time.
Optimism bias can lead to overconfidence, cutting corners and unrealistic expectations.
The not-for-profit and charity sector – perhaps by necessity – is full of leaders who believe that they can achieve their mission in good time, against the odds, and with limited resources.
At the Institute of Community Directors Australia (ICDA) we share that enthusiasm for doing good, and on taking a punt on doing things better (after all, our parent organisation’s motto is “Ready, fire, aim”) but we’re also advocates of good planning.
All NFPs and all community leaders are exposed to risk from the activities they undertake. Whether in community services, disability support, aged care provision, sports, events, education, animal welfare, international aid, the arts, health work, or protecting the environment, every organisation faces different but inevitable risks.
The heavy reliance on volunteers – who may be untrained or inexperienced in the area they’re expected to work in – creates other vulnerabilities.
At ICDA, we realise that risk management is not about red tape but instead the process of thinking systematically about all the possible risks, problems and disasters before they happen and setting up procedures that will negate or reduce the risk, or minimise or manage its impact.
It is no accident that ICDA has compiled a large library of resources, webinars, help sheets and policies to help not-for-profits manage their risks. These resources range from basic tools and guidelines to sophisticated strategies.
However complex the strategy, risk management boils down to three basic questions:
A great place to start with understanding risk is this help sheet: Ten steps to a safer organisation. In short, the help sheet suggests the following:
Another one of our help sheets, The main areas of risk for not-for-profit organisations, expands on how leaders can “work out the likely hazards”.
These can include:
If you’ve mastered the basics, your organisation is ready to consider developing a more detailed risk management process. ICDA can help with that too, with An introduction to the risk management process.
This help sheet describes a process comprising the following parts:
There are rewards for good risk management, which we summarise in another appropriately titled help sheet: Why implement a risk management program?
This explains how a good risk management framework will help you with the following:
To help your organisation roll out that risk management program, ICDA has produced a template risk management policy, vetted by our legal partners Maddocks, which follows a similar pathway to the helpsheets referred to in this report.
While every organisation will need to tailor such a policy to its own needs, the policy template is a useful starting point.
ICDA resources also include a template risk management register, which your organisation can adapt to suit its needs.
With more than 600,000 not-for-profits in Australia, it’s hard to say exactly what kind of insurance you’ll need. That’s partly a matter for your organisation’s risk appetite, the kind of risk management program you’ve developed, and also what insurance policies are available, and what they’ll cost.
In some cases, community organisations are automatically given insurance cover. For example, the Victorian Managed Insurance Authority (VMIA) provides cover to eligible community service organisations funded by state government departments.
While some organisations operate without insurance (see the earlier warning about optimism bias), it’s not something that ICDA or insurance experts recommend.
In our help sheet Types of insurance an organisation needs, we suggest the following:
“For most not-for-profit organisations, insurance is an essential component of risk management and a key way to manage losses. Even the most prudent and effective organisations can't foresee everything and prevent accidents from occurring.
“You want to make sure that the people who help you and are part of your organisation are covered for any potential liability, injury or loss. You also want to ensure that your equipment, materials and property are protected.
“A major reason why you need insurance is to ensure that you are not forced to close if you are exposed to a claim. While not all claims are enormous, the possibility of a multi-million-dollar claim does exist.”
The Institute of Community Directors Australia recently hosted the annual NFP Insurance Week in partnership with insurance brokers Aon, comprising a series of free webinars on a range of community-focused insurance matters, such as protecting volunteers and events, the types of insurance needed by NFPs, cyber insurance, and using prize indemnity insurance for fundraising.
Aon client director Gavin Deadman told delegates in a session on common risks faced by NFP boards and committees that insurance should be considered along with an effective risk management program.
Some risk can be transferred to insurers in areas such as:
“It’s really important to make sure you’re protecting your directors, both paid and voluntary, your managers, the people who are running your offices and your volunteers.”
He urged organisations to be aware of exposure to risk in new and growing areas, especially cybercrime, which had grown rapidly as a threat to organisations in the past five years.
Mr Deadman said determining the level and type of insurance cover could be a complex process, and suggested each organisation should tailor that cover to ensure their organisations and stakeholders were properly protected. Organisations such as Aon were able to provide professional advice, he said.
The webinars and slides from the presentations are available for a limited time.
Many of the insurance and risk management resources on the ICDA website mentioned in this article are listed here.
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
Fundraising experts say that better understanding donors’ attitudes to the community sector will go…
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
NFPs would be wise to consider innovative ways to diversify their income and the benefits of doing…
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
Small to medium not-for-profits have enjoyed a 5% donations spike compared to this time last year,…
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
A unique Australian investment vehicle is on track to give more than $100 million to Australian…
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
A year into her job connecting learning institutions and employers to help young people, Central…
Posted on 12 Sep 2024
Philanthropic expert Genevieve Timmons has updated her book Savvy Giving for a new decade. In this…
Posted on 11 Sep 2024
A leading not-for-profit (NFP) finance expert has urged NFPs and charities to rethink their views…
Posted on 17 Jul 2024
New research has laid bare Australians' vastly differing attitudes towards the community sector.
Posted on 17 Jul 2024
Charities Minister Andrew Leigh was put on the spot this month in ICDA’s quarterly newscast, the…
Posted on 12 Jun 2024
If you’re not careful, your annual general meeting (AGM) can be a deadly dull affair: the bare…
Posted on 12 Jun 2024
The end-of-year reporting process and the audit that comes with it are often seen as a challenging…
Posted on 12 Jun 2024
Annual reports have a bad rap, with many people thinking of them as dull and dusty doorstops.