Right on target: Disability advocate's approach to community impact
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Tania Sacco knows what it means to aim carefully. As a competitive archer who has represented…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
By Mike Davis, founder, Shackleton Labs
The average Australian not-for-profit sector employee is less satisfied about the rewards and career opportunities on offer than employees elsewhere.
That gap – backed up by research by the Voice Project is becoming more concerning, especially amid high levels of burnout, which has been demonstrated in multiple studies such as mental health services or in teaching to drive more people to leave their jobs.
Worryingly, the 2025 Pro Bono Australia Salary Survey found that 29 per cent of people who left NFP roles cited burnout as the main reason, up from 21 per cent in 2024.
And a 2023 McKinsey study of 474 Australian nonprofit leaders found 88 per cent were approaching or experiencing burnout, compared to the wider workforce burnout rate of approximately 46 per cent.
The rise reflects a range of converging factors. Many organisations are significantly reducing middle management roles to save money, often in response to chronic shortfalls in reliable, ongoing funding. That funding pressure also limits investment in professional development, succession planning and staff wellbeing.
When I started working in the not-for-profit sector 10 years ago, the “purpose premium” – a salary discount for working in a mission-driven organisation rather than for shareholders – was openly discussed.
I estimated it at about 10–20 per cent of salary that we were willing to leave on the table in exchange for that “purpose premium”.
Ten years on, the cost of living and inflation have increased dramatically, yet not-for-profit salaries haven’t kept up, nor have the perks.
My Jobs are also less satisfying because of a widely held view that every job must contribute to the organisation’s revenue goals. This in turn is leading to more burnout.
Instead of a “purpose premium”, the sector is facing a “purpose penalty”.
"Not-for-profits wanting to keep their strongest performers must offer interesting work, problem‑solving opportunities, innovation projects and an inclusive culture that encourages people to speak up and recognises their contribution."
Innovation can be a wellspring of inspiration for an over-worked, tired and disengaged not-for-profit sector. I’ve seen how running a strong innovation program – or even just communicating about innovation – can “turn on a light” in so many for-purpose employees.
Where education, wellbeing and professional development opportunities are limited, inclusive innovation programs offer the opportunity for employees to contribute ideas and help bring them to life. It’s an opportunity to manifest creativity, experiment and work “on” the machine rather than solely “in” the machine.
When we ran our first “shark tank” at Good Shepherd ANZ in 2024, there was palpable excitement across our 500 staff members, including frontline workers. In all, 40 per cent were involved in 40 group submissions to the competition.
When we ran monthly “innovation hours”, we would invite guest speakers from a range of industries and sectors to speak about their work, how they innovated in their sector, and what we could do differently and better. These sessions were well attended and sparked uplifting conversations for weeks afterward.
Those activations provided opportunities for employees to think differently and experiment with creativity, entrepreneurship, problem-solving and critical analysis.
When people regularly practise coming up with new ideas through activities like innovation challenges, idea-sharing systems, and working together to design new programs, they feel more engaged, optimistic, and proud of their work. This makes them more likely to stay.
Research suggests that organisations offering flexible, outcomes-based work are better placed to compete for talent in a tough labour market.
McKinsey has found that flexibility is now one of the top three workplace attributes that motivates workers, with organisations that fail to provide it facing higher risks of attrition, while data from Idealist shows that remote not-for-profit roles attract significantly more interest than onsite roles, in some cases receiving many more applications.
Not-for-profits wanting to keep their strongest performers must offer interesting work, problem‑solving opportunities, innovation projects and an inclusive culture that encourages people to speak up and recognises their contribution.
This all provides a way to reduce – or even reverse – the “purpose penalty”.
Not-for-profit retention studies suggest that when staff feel empowered to improve services, have input into decisions and can develop their skills, they are far less likely to look elsewhere even in a hot job market.
NFPs must prioritise learning on the job through a well-structured and engaging innovation program rather than relying on very limited and hard to access professional development budgets and external opportunities.
Innovation is not a nice-to-have for the not-for-profit sector – it is a practical response to workforce pressure, offering a way to rebuild engagement, strengthen skills and make roles more meaningful without increasing costs.
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Tania Sacco knows what it means to aim carefully. As a competitive archer who has represented…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Australian boards are being urged to strengthen their oversight of technology and artificial…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Earlier this year, a nine-member board I worked with lost four of its directors on the same day. It…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Many new directors walk into their first board meeting unprepared – not because they lack…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
The average Australian not-for-profit sector employee is less satisfied about the rewards and…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
Not-for-profits that seek to solve performance problems by hiring new staff might be missing the…
Posted on 15 Apr 2026
The Australian Red Cross has overhauled its governance, replacing a large member-based board with a…
Posted on 13 Apr 2026
A Community Directors survey of not-for-profit leaders’ biggest governance concerns has prompted a…
Posted on 12 Mar 2026
Australia’s not-for-profits win nearly half the grants they apply for, but time and resourcing…
Posted on 12 Mar 2026
If government were to give you a blank cheque for one million dollars tomorrow, what would you do…
Posted on 12 Mar 2026
Sector advocates are ramping up a campaign to give tens of thousands more charities favoured tax…
Posted on 12 Mar 2026
Fundraising is often parked in the operational corner. And yes, the execution of fundraising is an…