Until Claude can run a sausage sizzle, here’s how not-for-profits can benefit from AI
Posted on 22 Apr 2026
Don't be afraid to explore the ways that AI can help your not-for-profit. It would be remiss of a…
Posted on 22 Apr 2026
By Denis Moriarty, founder and group managing director, Our Community
Don't be afraid to explore the ways that AI can help your not-for-profit. It would be remiss of a NFP board not to be across what can be better done by artificial intelligence, as well as knowing where your invaluable volunteers and other humans can be of most benefit, writes Our Community's founder and leader, Denis Moriarty.
Artificial intelligence has a number of uses, and it can provide not-for-profits with useful assistance in a number of areas. Let’s face it, though: the reason the world is currently pouring a trillion dollars into building and running AI models isn’t that they improve business performance, except as a waystation. The promise is that they will enable companies to slash costs by slashing staff numbers.
For we soft-hearted not-for-profits (NFPs), that sounds bad. The spectre of mass unemployment, or even local unemployment, or even individuals packing up their desks after years at the company, raises concerns. Still, companies have goals – making money for the shareholders, primarily – that can balance or override their commitment to their workers, and not-for-profits have goals that can override those responsibilities not only financially but also morally. If you’re working to promote the interests of people with disability, their best interests have precedence over those of the helpers, however dedicated those may be.

We’ve been through similar technological upheavals before, after all, and society has adjusted. The very oldest among us can remember the era of the typing pool, a period of approximately 80 years when managers dictated letters to be typed up by secretaries, corrected, retyped, corrected again with white-out and scribble, and eventually snail-mailed out. Computerisation eliminated all that work, and after some perturbation the sector of women who used to be corralled into secretarial work erupted into the management positions they’d been excluded from and there were more women in employment, not fewer.
There are certainly going to be upheavals now, and economic consequences, and a need for governments to intervene to maximise benefits and minimise harms, but what does that mean, specifically, for your own NFP? How are you going to deal with the HR issues that will arise?
There are several layers of prediction involved here. Will there be large job losses across the economy, or is AI (this year, at least, or this decade) a speculative bubble? If there are job losses, will your NFP be caught up? If your community group can cut staff numbers, should you?
Looking at smaller NFPs in particular – those without their own HR divisions, say – there are a few extra factors to consider. One is how much of your work involves the hands-on human interaction that AI can only feint at (ignore those cartwheeling robots: false advertising). Drafting letters, AI can do; changing incontinence pads, no, not now, not for the foreseeable future. It’s a spectrum: where does your organisation fall?
One factor that’s peculiar to the NFP sector is that a lot of the work is done by volunteers. Laying off a volunteer gains you very little – the amount of staff time it takes to organise and regulate them – and can lose you quite a lot. Volunteers are not simply meat-based robots. For the group you’re helping, they provide human contact, friendship, and problem-solving skills. For the organisation, they provide the first circle of the people you can call on to promote your image, defend your importance, and even finance your budget.
“Volunteers are not simply meat-based robots.”
People are volunteers because they enjoy it, and that gives you some small claim on them. If you’re one of those rare groups that really don’t need any volunteers on the ground, we recommend that you start beating your brains for something they can do that won’t be an actual handicap. Volunteerdom is, among other things, an incentive you can offer members of the public to help you build support in the community – a benefit, not a cost.
If you have paid staff, of course, the balance is different. The issues you’ll be looking at then are things like risk management. How many of your operations have horrible consequences if there’s a massive AI stuff-up? The models are improving, and the chance of disaster is probably small – but how small do you need it to be? How much staff time would you have to invest to ensure that the message “I am so sorry, that was careless of me: I hallucinated” doesn’t pop up, and what is the worst that could happen if it did?
There are clearly areas where small NFPs can be helped by AI. There’s a lot of bureaucratic busywork that could be delegated to an AI model. You fill out forms, you put in reports, you draft submissions, and in all of these there’s enough repetition, enough formulaic jargon, and enough follow-the-leader to make it handy to have someone or something that knows the ropes and can untie them.
Many, many small groups believe they can’t write properly formal text, or can’t understand legal jargon, or can’t get themselves heard, and an app that can do enough hand-holding to build confidence could do a lot to equalise the chances of large and small organisations.
Many, many boards don’t have a firm enough grip on how their organisations work to be sure whether they’re understaffed or overstaffed, and going through the exercise of working out what place AI might have will probably be a useful discipline. If you’ve thought it all through, go with it.
Don’t underestimate the difficulties your board faces in these matters, though. Don’t take my word for it – and damn certainly don’t look to ChatGPT or Claude for the answer. Or maybe you should.
Denis Moriarty is group managing director of OurCommunity.com.au, a social enterprise that helps the country's 600,000 not-for-profits.
We're proud to take a stand on progressive issues. Here are more recent opinion pieces.
Posted on 22 Apr 2026
Don't be afraid to explore the ways that AI can help your not-for-profit. It would be remiss of a…
Posted on 08 Apr 2026
It doesn't seem unreasonable to ask our political parties to actually outline their policies, what…
Posted on 25 Mar 2026
Among the many ways artificial intelligence is upending the foundations of how we work is its…
Posted on 11 Mar 2026
Australia has offered asylum to members of the Iranian football team. That’s fine, but it does draw…
Posted on 25 Feb 2026
A Victorian suburb's hot debate about whether trains should live underground or in the sky ended…
Posted on 11 Feb 2026
Opinions polls insist Pauline Hanson's fortunes are on the rise, but it is likely that enthusiasm…
Posted on 28 Jan 2026
This year’s Adelaide Writers’ Week began with the cancellation of a talk by Palestinian-Australian…
Posted on 17 Dec 2025
Posturing by the US president about Europe's immigration policies, even warnings of future…
Posted on 03 Dec 2025
If you wanted an example of the problems inherent in federal systems, you couldn’t do better than…
Posted on 19 Nov 2025
When it comes to loyalty to car brands, it can be confusing who we should support, and, even more…
Posted on 05 Nov 2025
Before the Prime Minister gets too excited about his recent meeting with the American President, he…
Posted on 14 Oct 2025
The idea of "long term" is not something that sits well in the social media era, yet governments…