Forget the facts: values-framing is how to connect with potential NFP supporters

We all have a Confirmation Bias, which means that if a new piece of information doesn’t fit with our current belief system, we are more likely to dismiss it as incorrect or unreliable rather than change our minds.

So where does that leave think tanks and not-for-profits? If graphs and statistics won’t change people’s minds, how do think tanks and NFP policy and communications teams influence public perceptions and decision-makers concerning their issue? Evidence is still crucial, but we must also speak to people on an emotional level using values-based framing.

The power of framing

Framing refers to the way ideas are presented, which affects how people perceive them. For example, a person could be framed as either a consumer or a citizen – the two words bring up very different mental images and emotions. If we use a phrase like ‘tax relief,’ it frames tax as a burden, a bad thing, implying that tax cuts are good. Whereas the phrase ‘tax contributions’ frames tax as a social responsibility that benefits the whole community.

Framing can have a profound effect on support for, or opposition to, a policy. We saw this when early discussions around ‘same sex marriage’ drew polarising views, but reframing the issue as ‘marriage equality’ emphasised that all people should have the same rights and drew significantly more community support.

The power of values

Research shows that we can increase support for progressive ideas by framing them in intrinsic values (for more on this, visit the experts, Common Cause Australia). Intrinsic values are things people value for their own sake, not for what we can get from them, like honesty, justice, equality, etc. Extrinsic values are things we value not for their own sake but for the benefits they bring, like power, wealth or achievement.

The cost of cost-benefit analysis

For most NFPs, our causes ­— the NDIS, gender equality, workers rights, equitable housing, etc — are all things that should be valued intrinsically, not only for their economic benefits. However, think tanks and NFPs are often stuck in the difficult position of being asked to justify the economic benefit of their work to Ministers, funders and other stakeholders. This can shoot our cause in the foot because framing, say, housing homeless people only in terms of economic benefit, can put our audience in an extrinsic frame of mind, leading them to value profit over people.

This extrinsic framing has been expertly used by conservatives for five decades now to shift Western societies towards increasingly individualistic and neoliberal views. We progressives must fight back by framing our issues in intrinsic values first, before presenting our facts.

Winning hearts then minds

To continue our example of housing homeless people, if we were to first frame the issue in terms of the life changing impacts these people experienced, our audience are more likely to be in an intrinsic mindset, agreeing with our values, when we then follow with our facts and data. Beginning with stories of people with lived experience of our issue, or casting a vision of the world we want to see can help frame our argument in intrinsic values from the outset.

Values-based framing is both a short term and long term project. In the short term, it can help to secure increased support for our current policy issues. Whilst obviously not a silver bullet for winning policy change, the evidence suggests it can help. Over the long term, it can help embed progressive narratives like collectivism in the population’s worldview. In the battle to win policy change for a fairer, more equitable world, we must win hearts before we can win minds.

About the author

Meredith is a communications specialist with over a decade of experience in the non-profit sector and communications agencies. As Per Capita’s Director of Communications and Operations, she translates complex policy research into clear, compelling messages for the general public, media, and other audiences. Meredith specialises in strategic messaging and the role of behavioural psychology in communication.